Hero, respect the hustle

Villain, arrest that monkey

Honestly, I’d have done the same

Wait, which pair did he take?

Me, on a delicate cycle, just like Kylie

The dry cleaner, obviously

Nobody, it’s a wearable piece of art

The intern, unfortunately

Exclude it automatically, because allowing evidence obtained through an unlawful search weakens fundamental legal protections and incentives for proper police procedure.

Permit its use only when a judge determines that officers acted in good faith and the procedural error did not seriously prejudice rights.

Allow courts to consider the seriousness of the alleged offence, but require a high threshold before admitting material obtained through defective warrants.

Distinguish administrative mistakes from deliberate abuses, imposing stronger exclusion rules and personal accountability where authorities knowingly disregard legal safeguards.

Permit relevant evidence while separately sanctioning procedural errors, because excluding reliable material may undermine investigations and the interests of justice.

Require investigators to seek new lawful authorisation wherever possible before deciding whether previously seized material may be retained or examined.

Only when a court or independent authority identifies a serious security or legal justification, not because officials dislike critical coverage.

When objective and publicly available accreditation standards have been breached, provided affected journalists receive an opportunity to contest the decision.

For narrowly defined security concerns, with temporary limits and independent review to prevent the restriction becoming an informal punishment for unfavourable reporting.

When repeated and demonstrable professional misconduct occurs, but only after a transparent process distinguishes factual errors from legitimate political criticism.

Governments should have reasonable discretion over invitations to particular events, while maintaining broad and nondiscriminatory access to routine press briefings.

No established news organisation should lose ordinary briefing access for editorial decisions, because accountability requires the government to tolerate hostile questioning.

A substantial bonus is justified once an alliance passes a clearly defined threshold, because the ability to form a stable government benefits voters.

A modest bonus may be appropriate, but it should be limited enough to preserve meaningful representation for voters supporting smaller parties.

Extra seats should be available only after a second-round election gives voters a direct opportunity to choose between the leading alliances.

Parliamentary majorities should be negotiated after elections, because coalition-building reflects the distribution of votes more faithfully than automatic seat bonuses

No bonus should be awarded under any circumstances, since each party's parliamentary representation should remain strictly proportional to its electoral support.

Majority bonuses could be acceptable if introduced well before elections and approved through a broad agreement spanning government and opposition parties.

Flip Phones

Ipods

Gameboys

Watch a gladiator fight in the Colosseum

Walk through the Forum and see the ruins

Eat authentic Roman food

Ask Julius Caesar for his opinion on modern politics

Smartphones and fast internet

Cars and fast travel

Takeout and modern food

Nothing, they’d adapt with rope and logs

M3

3 Series

X5

i4 (electric)

Z4

Wild horses roaming free

Towering pine forests

Mountain mist at sunrise

Untouched meadows and streams

A driver’s podium finish

A celebrity spotted in the crowd

The champagne spraying

The trophy presentation

I’m not sure

Choosing the worst possible time to visit

Forgetting to check the travel news before leaving

Packing a suitcase too heavy to run with

Assuming the crosswalk was a shortcut

Their vacation was perfectly planned

To draw attention to the cause

To make a humorous or satirical point

For a social media post

To stand out in a crowd

I don’t think people do this