Yes — constitutional protection should be explicit — fundamental rights should clearly cover sexual identity rather than depend on interpretation.

Yes, but only as part of a broader anti-discrimination reform — other potentially vulnerable groups should be reviewed at the same time.

Existing constitutional protections are already sufficient — Germany can combat discrimination through ordinary legislation without amending the Basic Law.

No — constitutions should contain only broad universal principles — repeatedly adding categories risks making constitutional law increasingly specific.

Not sure — I would want to see the exact legal wording first.