Yes, absolutely — I’d take every healthy year I could get. Living longer in good physical and mental condition would be too valuable to refuse, even if it meant watching many people I love grow old before me.

Yes — but mainly for the extra experiences and opportunities. I’d want the additional decades to travel, learn, build things, meet new people, and see how the world changes.

Probably yes, although losing people along the way would be extremely difficult. The emotional cost would be high, but I think the benefits of a long, healthy life would ultimately outweigh it.

I’m genuinely unsure — it sounds like both a gift and a burden. Good health at 120 is incredibly attractive, but repeatedly losing friends, partners, and family members could make such longevity emotionally exhausting.

Probably not — I’d rather age alongside the people I love. For me, sharing the same stages of life with family and friends would matter more than having several extra decades alone.

No — outliving almost everyone close to me would be too painful. Even perfect health would not compensate for the loneliness and grief that could come with such an unusually long lifespan.

No — a longer life isn’t necessarily a better life. I care more about the meaning, relationships, and quality of my years than maximizing how many years I live.

I’d choose 120 only if at least some people I love could live that long too. Longevity would be appealing, but only if it could be shared rather than experienced largely alone.